Re: [ba-poker] Re: [FARGO] Is 3:2 Enough? Thanks

[William Chen <wchen_8369(deleted the rest)>]

--- Ed Fernandez <edf(deleted the rest)> wrote:
> I think this is what I've been trying to say all
> along, and was not 
> (perhaps) successful at getting my point across. In
> my opinion, how the 
> short stack is reacting to the maniac (and to you)
> is the primary 
> decision point for you as to whether you should call
> or fold.
> 
> Ed

Wait a minute.  You said:

 If the
> short stack is 
> letting himself get blinded off, why in the world
> would you gamble here 
> with 66? You should be pounding on the short stack
> too, and once he 
> gets busted, then you take your shots with the
> maniac. 

Crunch's analysis was that if the short stack is
willing to take on the maniac, you should fold.  Here
you are saying if the short stack is willing to be
blinded off, you should fold.  WHICH IS IT?