--- Ed Fernandez <edf(deleted the rest)> wrote:
I think this is what I've been trying to say all
along, and was not
(perhaps) successful at getting my point across. In
my opinion, how the
short stack is reacting to the maniac (and to you)
is the primary
decision point for you as to whether you should call
or fold.
Ed
Wait a minute. You said:
If the
short stack is
letting himself get blinded off, why in the world
would you gamble here
with 66? You should be pounding on the short stack
too, and once he
gets busted, then you take your shots with the
maniac.
Crunch's analysis was that if the short stack is
willing to take on the maniac, you should fold. Here
you are saying if the short stack is willing to be
blinded off, you should fold. WHICH IS IT?