[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] Re: [FARGO] Is 3:2 Enough? Thanks
- To: Ken Kubey <kubey(deleted the rest)>
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] Re: [FARGO] Is 3:2 Enough? Thanks
- From: Steve Daniel <stephen.daniel(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 18:39:12 -0500
That is the question I am expanding my model to answer. Once I add in
the P(BB Calls) and then P(BB Wins) the model will compute the EVs of my
calling or folding. I can then solve (thank the Lord for Goal Seeker,
math is hard) for what my P(winning hand) needs to be for the two EVs
to me the same. I can then find what is the minimum hand vs a random
hand greater then that P. I may not get to this for a few days as I
have some real world work to get done tonight and tomorrow and I play on
playing in this same event tomorrow night.
Ken Kubey wrote:
> I've found this discussion pretty interesting.
>
> The most funny part to me is that if Crunch's 66 holds up
> against the J2o, I don't think we ever get to discuss this hand.
> I imagine Cruch was thrilled when he saw the guy's hand.
>
> Now, it seems that Ed and Crunch agree that folding would be better.
> My question is:
>
> What hand would you call the bet with? TT? JJ? AK? AQ?
>
> Ken Kubey kubey(deleted the rest) (650) 933-3536
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]