[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] Bots
- To: bap <ba-poker(deleted the rest)>
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] Bots
- From: Jim Geary <jaygee(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 02:30:15 -0500 (EST)
You find the bot, lay me 3:2 on my money and I'll play for as much per
game as anyone can muster. Surely this should be a good deal for a
crushing computer.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Jeffrey Siegal wrote:
> Michael Wiesenberg wrote:
> > At Thursday, 3/4/2004 02:01 PM -0800, James Kittock wrote:
> >
> >> Having said that, there are games where a "bot",
> >> that is, a computer program, makes the game
> >> relatively pointless for humans. Scrabble is
> >> a good example--well-written Scrabble programs
> >> generally crush the best human players.
> >
> >
> > Do you have proof of this?
>
> If you'll forgive the appeal to authority, how about:
>
> "Computer Scrabble programs have achieved a level of performance that
> exceeds that of the strongest human players."
> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=512159
>
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]