RE: [ba-poker] RGPM: Moderator Selection - Call for Volunteers

[William Chen <wchen_8369(deleted the rest)>]

Quick has some points I wnt to respond to. 


> 1) Peter has a good point. Not real effective to
> have fragmented, independent discussions on 
> something that will be decided with in a single
> election.

Well, he brought the call for moderators on this list.
 I thought it was fair game to point our that it's not
a done deal yet, and that I personally object to such
a list. 

And I have changed my mind about getting involved in
this debate.  I will make a post on about why I oppose
the creation of RGPM, and won't participate in it. 


> 
> 2) Why do you want to continue the discussion here?
> Select audience? Less noise? 

The same reason you are continuing the
discussion--because I think there are some points that
are worth making to the audience on this list.   I
also took exception with my opinion being labelled as
uninformed.

> 
> 3) You're conducting a discussion about the effect
> (+ or -) of something on RGP.  You seem to want to 
> conduct that discussion *off* of RGP. 
> Isn't that a form of moderation?

No, since I am not putting any restrictions on what
Peter or anyone else is saying here.  What we're
having is a fair and open exchange--something that
happens on an open, unmoderated list.   


Bill