Re: [ba-poker] RGPM: Moderator Selection - Call for Volunteers

[William Chen <wchen_8369(deleted the rest)>]

So I've posted my reasons on RGP why I will vote NO if
there is a CFV, and why I encourage everyone else to
do the same.  Further I think unless you wholeheartly
agree with the creation of the group,  you should not
support the idea by signing up to be a moderator.  It
hasn't shown up on google yet, so I can't post a
link--but I will when it shows up.   

And I do still feel that since Peter posted here
recruiting moderators, I was well within bounds to
argue the other side of not creating a RGPM.  

I won't repeat my post here, but I am not against all
moderated groups.   In fact I support the proposal of
creating a RGP.strategy subgroup, moderated or not. 

Bill