[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] RGPM: Moderator Selection - Call for Volunteers
- To: ba-poker(deleted the rest)
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] RGPM: Moderator Selection - Call for Volunteers
- From: William Chen <wchen_8369(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:35:29 -0800 (PST)
--- foldem <peter(deleted the rest)> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:26:49 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
> >Ok, so I've read the Charter for RGPM. They seem
> so
> >general that 70% of what's posted on RGP would be
> >allowed on RPGM anyway, and that cross posting will
> be
> >allowed. Am I missing something?
> >
> I don't think so.
>
> I apologize for my tone yesterday. It wasn't
> necessary and not
> intended to offend.
Me too. I get grumpy in the mornings and I don't drink
coffee:-).
>
> RGP will still be there for everyone to post
> whatever they want. RGPM
> is a new group that will filter out, as you say,
> about 30% of the
> current traffic or possibly more.
>
> I would be delighted to have you take part in the
> discussions on RGP
> and NG, but I don't want to drag this into all the
> email lists. I
> posted asking for moderators in ba-poker because I
> know that many
> former RGP readers are on the list and don't read
> RGP any longer but
> might be interested in RGPM.
Agreed! Let's slug it out there (and news.groups).
Just to get everyone up to date, there's been a RFD
(Request for Discussion) but no CFV (Call for Votes)
yet on RPGM. This is the right time for everyone to
participate and posts their opinions pros/cons on this
new group.
Good luck,
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]