[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] Baby No-Limit Hold'em Game at Lucky Chances
- To: ba-poker(deleted the rest)
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] Baby No-Limit Hold'em Game at Lucky Chances
- From: Michael Keohan <mkcards(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Any comments on the 10-10-20 NL game at Lucky Chances?
What do you think of that one in comparison to the
"baby" one?
Thanks...Mike
--- Alan Bostick <abostick(deleted the rest)> wrote:
>
> Lucky Chances Casino, in Colma, California, is now
> spreading a
> small-buyin no-limit Texas hold'em game.
>
> The structure is $1 blind on the dealer button, $1
> middle blind and
> $2 big blind, with action starting at $4 to go. The
> minimum buy-in
> is $40 and the maximum is $100. You can only buy
> more chips if you
> have less than $100 in front of you, and only enough
> to bring your
> stack up to $100. Unlike the larger NLHE games at
> Lucky Chances,
> players may not kill, and new players do not need to
> post to get a hand.
>
> Except for the blind structure, peculiar to Northern
> California lowball
> and NLHE games, the game is structured identically
> to the no-limit
> games one finds at online poker sites, such as
> PokerStars or
> UltimateBet.
>
> Lucky Chances' management is clearly hoping to
> capitalize on the
> interest in no-limit hold'em generated by poker
> games on television
> such as the World Poker Tour.
>
> I am told that they began to spread the game last
> Wednesday (April 7).
> On Friday night, the game was lively and spirited,
> with a significant
> list of players waiting to get in. The quality of
> play was about what
> you might expect, i.e. terrible ? not quite as bad
> as you'd find in the
> dime-and-quarter-blind games on PokerStars, but
> still pretty easy to
> beat
> over time. Be prepared to weather some outrageous
> beats, but on the
> whole a
> nd overall solid play is going to win the money.
>
> I have no clue whether or not the game is going to
> be sustainable.
> No-limit poker is notorious for the ease with which
> the better players
> can take the poorer players' money. The game might
> burn out its player
> base really quickly. On the other hand, if no-limit
> hold'em on
> television continues to attract new players into
> cardrooms, this game
> might turn out
> to be sustainable over the long haul.
>
> Grab your rods and reels and your best lures, folks!
> The fish are
> biting
> at Lucky Chances.
>
> --
> Alan Bostick | This Age wanted heroes.
> abostick(deleted the rest) | It got us instead
> | Tony Kushner, A BRIGHT
> ROOM CALLED DAY
> http://www.spicejar.org/asiplease/
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]