Re: [ba-poker] Baby No-Limit Hold'em Game at Lucky Chances

[Michael Hunter <mph(deleted the rest)>]

On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 18:49, Brian Goetz wrote:
> and many of these players are BAD.
> They're mostly 3-6 and 6-12 players looking for MORE ACTION!  So,
> would you rather play in a typical no-capped NL game with typical NL
> players, or a capped game with 3-6 players?  The answer isn't obvious.
> 

Maybe I'm overly influenced by the palace and the lake. I get those
same guys buying in for a $100 minimum with many buying in for a $500
or more.  Why would I want to spread out the time it takes for
those guys to go bust?

A more interesting question involves deciding if you want to play
in an offered limit game (LC 6-12, LC 20-40) or a capped game.  I
can't imagine getting out of most of the GC 20-40s for a capped game
(and if I did I'd go home and play 4 capped games sans toke), but
I would strongly consider player the capped game instead of the
3-6 or the 6-12.  So for smaller BRs/interested earn rates the
answer might be more obvious.

                        mph