[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] Story from SFGate
- To: bap <ba-poker(deleted the rest)>
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] Story from SFGate
- From: Nate Grover <nate_grover(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
--- William Chen <wchen_8369(deleted the rest)> wrote:
> At the Oaks? The game is beatable, whether 2-4 Stud
> or 2-4 Hold'em. I have several hundreds of hours to
> prove it.
This game is definitely NOT beatable. I also have
several hundreds of hours to prove it. I also have
several hundreds of hours that prove the 3-6 is not
beatable. Neither is the 6-12. The 4-8 stud game is
break even at best. The 15-30 most certainly cannot
be beaten. I have put hundreds of hours into those
games too just to make sure I was right and yep, I was
right. They can't be beat.
The 20-40 at Lucky Chances seemed beatable at first
but I have recently proven that no, it's not beatable,
either. Of course, the 6-12 and 9-18 at LCs are
bankroll killers, that goes without saying.
natedogg
=====
--
It's me, Nate Grover
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]