[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] You've got to know when to fold 'em
- To: Ken Kubey <kubey(deleted the rest)>, ba-poker(deleted the rest)
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] You've got to know when to fold 'em
- From: William Chen <wchen_8369(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:08:55 -0800 (PST)
--- Ken Kubey <kubey(deleted the rest)> wrote:
> I've seen this argument before.
> So, the "do no harm" play is: check and fold to any
> bet unless
> you make the nuts. Correct?
Well only if that's how you would play 82 on a flop of
K93. Maybe since you wer the original raiser you
might bet again.
>
> No one can actually play like that.
Well actually most players *can* play like this, they
just choose not to do it. I would think most players
actually get more value out of KQ on a flop of K93
than they would had they plyed 8
>
> They call NL hands like KQ and AQ "trouble hands"
> for a reason.
> You hit the flop pretty hard or even very hard and
> can easily
> lose all of your chips in a raised pot. Same for AK
> sometimes.
You can do this with AA and 82 also.
>
> Pretty rare to hit the flop with 44 and not be way
> ahead.
> * In a big live NL ring game, I'd rather play 76o
> than 76s.
Then you do not understand anything I said in my last
post about "first do no harm."
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]