[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: [ba-poker] Bay 101 trip report
- To: ba-poker(deleted the rest)
- Subject: Re: [ba-poker] Bay 101 trip report
- From: kubey(deleted the rest) (Ken Kubey)
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:36:47 -0800 (PST)
tjs wrote:
> Low-limit tables are still 9-handed. I don't know where they're drawing
> the distinction or what
Big games are time charge, so Bay 101 wants more people paying
time = 10-handed
Low-limit games are raked, Bay 101 wants more hands dealt = 9-handed
Makes perfect sense.
On shuffle tracking...
If a brand new deck is put in, I'd want to avoid playing
hands like JTs, 98s, 76s, etc. if I think the shuffle is weak, right?
I don't want to think about trying to track a poor shuffle
of a normal deck after a hand is played. Seems very complex.
Ken Kubey kubey(deleted the rest) (650) 933-3536
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]