[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]
Re: Re: [ba-poker] Ethics of using PokerTracker
- To: Uncle Roger <rogerc22(deleted the rest)>
- Subject: Re: Re: [ba-poker] Ethics of using PokerTracker
- From: Hubert Chen <hubert(deleted the rest)>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:09:20 -0700
Do people have an opinion on PokerTracker.com vs www.poker-edge.com?
Short summary of architecture differences:
PokerTracker.com is a thinly veiled, packaged MS Access SQL database(you
can't write arbitrary queries against it afaik). You buy it as software it
for $55. Has support for a wider variety of sites, including paradise,
party, ub. It reads its information from hand histories, which you
supply it.(And as discussed there's also a market for buying/selling
hand histories). Omaha+O8 application in beta right now.
Poker-edge is a client server application, which gives you access to a
massive online database of poker players including those you have not
played against. You pay for it as a service on a monthly basis. For $10/mo
you get access to games up to 3/6 and $50 max buyin nl/pl. For $20/mo
you get access to all stakes games. Supports only hold'em on party poker
and affiliates
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Uncle Roger wrote:
> I don't see any ethical problem. If you play a game by its rules, you're
> playing it ethically. The online sites clearly contemplate that people
> will be using software like Poker Tracker. I corresponded once about this
> with customer support at one of the sites, and the person who answered
> defended the practice, analogizing it to a player taking notes in a live
> game.
>
> My problem is I don't think that downloading poker software, figuring it
> out, and using it during play is likely to be much fun. I'd rather just
> play poker.
>
> To each their own. If others like it, then fine for them. But I wish
> there were a choice among sites, with some of them trying to make it less
> easy to do computerized hand tracking.
>
> Maybe there's some benefit, such as preventing cheating, in letting players
> harvest hundreds of hand histories. But if the reason is to promote hand
> tracking, that takes some of the fun out of it for players like me.
>
> I haven't used hand tracking software yet. When online, I play mainly
> in sit-and-go tourneys. I'm hoping that the software is less useful in
> sit-and-goes because of the swings in the number of players sitting at the
> table. If I'm wrong about that, please tell me.
>
> I guess I will get around to buying the software sooner or later. Who
> knows, maybe it will turn out to be fun to use in some way I haven't
> foreseen. I doubt it, though.
>
> Roger
>
>
> --
> https://stubing.kerndt.com/mailman/listinfo/ba-poker
--
Hubert Chen <hubert(deleted the rest)>
http://www.chen.net/~hubt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Month Index]